1)grey is where I added a line to split ranks by habit or xeric etc. (added "0.1" to the sorting numbers)

2) All carnivorous-herb (i.e nepenthaceae, and some in comments) are scored as herbs

3) where  a line is completely hightlighed in yellow, that line probably should be deleted. (duplicate information, and/or empty of genus and/or rank data)

4) Sort-LeosHabit-comments1-966: means that I went back to original data and worked out which were habit comments made by him

There is some noise, ie some were not direct comments for all, but for at least one of the split-out rank values "2r3-3r2: [2r3 is an herb] for example"

I can reduce this to Specific Leo only habit scores, This will remove about 100.

Alternatively, you can extract the Leo-only habit data by using the column A[HabitPartition] (which has 0= leo's habits, 1=my expanded scoring based on literature searches etc).



HabitParition
Sort-LeosHabit-comments1-966
Habit sort 
Sort_whole_expanded-ori_data
Final_Family_Use
Final_Genus_Use
Leo_sp.
rmin
rmax
rmin.num.NA
rmax.num.NA
rmin.num.0
rmax.num.0
habit
Reversion
Revised Habit
Comments